|
Pharisaism, thy name is
Politics
11
Col (r) Ikram Ullah Khan
“Political language is designed to make lies
sound true and murder respectable, as it teaches
us that a good politician, under democracy, is
as unthinkable as an honest burglar”.( George
Orwell )
Before I discuss and analyze the type of
politics being practiced in Pakistan under the
guise of democracy, let me give very succinctly
the background of democracy.
The word “democracy” as well as the concept it
represents, can be traced back to the Greeks of
sixth century BC. The Greek system of government
was perhaps closer to a true democracy than any
other in history. The Greeks viewed dictatorship
as the worst possible form of government, so the
government they evolved was the exact opposite
to dictatorship.
A very relevant question pertaining to democracy
as to how many people hold power in society, and
how they exercise it has been an eternal theme
of political debate. At one extreme, a single
person rules. Such a system is usually called
monarchy (rule by one man). It is generally
named as dictatorship when power is seized by
one individual. The other extreme is democracy
(rule by the people) in which theoretically
every adult can influence collective decisions.
Between these two extremes is oligarchy (rule of
a few).
For democracy to succeed, there are certain
preconditions which must exist before this
system is practiced. Firstly, the community must
be educated enough to discern between good and
bad, genuine and spurious leaders before they
exercise their right of vote. Secondly, the
community must be disciplined enough to be
managed, and be capable enough of attending
debates and voting on issues of national
importance. Thirdly, the economy of the country
must give the citizens enough leisure to engage
in politics. Fourthly, presence of honest,
dedicated and sincere leaders untarnished by
allegations of corruptions and moral turpitude.
In the context of Pakistan, all these
preconditions are absent. So the fate of
democracy in our country is quite
understandable.
Democracy in Pakistan has met its waterloo due
to multiple reasons such as incompetent and
corrupt elements ruling the roost, insufficient
assertiveness by the legislators, alienation and
disengagement of educated middle class from
politics, feudalism, lack of active citizenry
exercising accountability and lack of commitment
and sincerity on the part of political leaders
practicing politics as a profitable business.
It is a very sad reflection on the reputation of
our politicians that Ethics and Politics are
perceived as an oxymoron, a figure of speech,
which links two contradictory concepts. Like
chalk and cheese, ethics and politics don’t seem
to go together. Politicians are generally
considered to be least trustworthy
professionals. Unfortunately, this is a widely
held view expressed in numerous aphorisms.
But nothing demonstrates more vividly the
absence of ethical values in the conduct of
political affairs and loss of trust in political
leaders than the myriad events that have led to
tarnish the image of public representative in
the eyes of the masses.
If policies were guided by ethical
considerations then we would have seen
altogether different political culture
developing in the land of the pure (Pakistan).
But unfortunately diametrically opposite is the
case.
The dramatic events during the last five
decades, mainly resulting from advances in
science and technology, have made it necessary
to adopt policies that are radically different
from those advocated and adopted by our leaders
(both political and military). We have to learn
to live together; otherwise we shall all die
together as a nation. We must endeavor to create
conditions that will enable us to survive as a
proud nation with our heads high and this can
only be possible if we are led by leaders who
are trustworthy and possess unblemished
character.
It is shocking to find politics practiced by our
leaders repugnant and repulsive because of
blatant duplicity. Our leaders proclaim
themselves as the champions of democracy while
actually acting in a dictatorial manner. They,
as leaders, are supposed to uphold the rule of
law, yet they turn out to be the biggest
violators of law. To me, such practices are
unacceptable in a civilized society because in
the long run, they would play havoc with the
very foundations of the country. Our rulers are
seen busy in convincing the gullible public that
our survival lies in democracy but act in a
manner that contradicts their basic assertion.
The integrity in politics has gone down the
road. Public is disgusted with the misdemeanor
of our political leaders. How can we claim to be
a proud Pakistani when majority of our leaders
have no integrity? How can we claim to be a
proud nation when our leaders with begging bowls
in their hands make a foreign trip at
government’s expense and live in five star
hotels behaving like a prince? Our country was
built on integrity and ethics. We preach it to
our kids. We chastise other people when they
display unethical behavior because it affects
our kids. But when it comes to our own action,
we simply dissimulate and indulge in undesirable
activities with least compunction and remorse.
The other day I saw a public representative
belonging to a mainstream political party
appearing on a TV talk show and comparing his
salary, perks and privileges with that of a
federal secretary without realizing that it is
much below the dignity of a public
representative to draw an unwarranted comparison
with a government servant. If this is the
approach of our leadership then how can we
expect democracy to deliver?
Democracy, the most popular concept of
governance in the world has been extensively
abused in our country by our politicians. The
word, on the face of it is so fascinating to
populace that they get mesmerized when our
leaders, in a bid to cover up their weaknesses,
use it as a powerful weapon to befool them.
Our beloved mother land is passing through the
worst kind of crises in its chequered history
these days. Ethical standards of our leaders are
operating at a diminishing rate. Corruption,
deceitfulness, falsity and other social evils
are rampant in our society. Financially, the
country has almost collapsed and is touching the
borders of bankruptcy. But the elite, as usual,
is trumpeting the slogan of sap achha (all ok).
Our doctors (financial wizards) are
unsuccessfully trying to keep the economy alive
through artificial oxygen (IMF, WB, ADB, etc).
The galloping inflation has made it extremely
hard for an average man to keep body and soul
together. Poor people finding no other way
resort to commit suicide and register their
protest through self-immolation. The unemployed
youth give vent to their anger by carrying out
terrorist activities. The chasm between the rich
and the poor is widening at an alarming
proportion. But the apathy of our leadership has
hardened them to an extent that they fail to
fathom the pain felt by the poor.
Situational politics has supplanted the
principled one. The spurious democracy being
practiced by our unseasoned politicians has been
instrumental in producing the turncoats who,
being bereft of moral scruples are ever ready to
change loyalties giving birth to lotacracy
thereby turning politics into a profitable
business. Our politicians do one thing and say
another. They have grown ice cold and their
numbness to the pain of the poor and the
downtrodden is so ominous that it has started
ringing the alarm bell of revolution. Our
mainstream politicians, in a bid to save
democracy have put the very existence of the
country into a danger.
The recent Tunisian and Egyptian revolution
heralding a change in Libya, Yemen and Jordan
should serve as an eye opener for our rulers.
The situation seems to be ripe for a revolution
and Raymond Davis episode and the like may be
the catalyst for a possible change.
A massive uprising against the present
leadership (ruling and opposition both) is
knocking at the door. If that happens, it will
wash away everything that comes in its way. Our
leadership must understand that revolution is
writing on the wall and from the ashes of that
revolution will emerge a true and genuine
leadership. The defence mechanism which our
rulers apply to console themselves and to
appease the furious public may backfire.
It is time our leaders stand up and display
moral scruples and integrity. It is time to vote
these old political dilettantes out and bring in
new blood. Pakistan zinda baad
-- Col (r) Ikram
Ullah Khan, COMSATS University, Abbottabad
Campus, 25 Feb 2011..
Comment (1)
I am very much
thankful to respectable Col(r) Ikramullah Khan for
his thought provoking, intellectual & true
philosophical analysis of the system being practiced
in Pakistan in the name of democracy. The writer has
left no stone unturned in explaining the true
meaning of Democracy with the historical evolution
of the concept. I would like to add only one
sentence that Democracy is not only a political
system rather it is a state of mind of every
individual & it resides within a person.
-- Syed mazhar Ali Shah,
Charun,Chitral, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (2)
i have a few questions
in my mind.....,can we compare our situation with
those of the Arab countries where there is no
democracy at all?..do we have any other alternative
for democracy?...why can't we let the democratic
process continue and let it evolve through trial and
error rather than finding other options?....should
we invite a dictator again and wait for our nation
to be educated, the most important prerequisite for
democracy (though it has not occurred during the
more than three decades of military rule)???
-- Dr.Fayaz Ali Roomi,
Peshawar, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (3)
A very fine article.
As is the idea, so is the standard of presentation,
a cut above class here.
--
Shahid, Chitral, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (4)
By and large, in the
article only dark side has very vividly been
tinctured which made it like one sided game; If some
achievement could also be lime-lighted definitely
would give it more vibrance and dynamism. Suppose,
if our political field is not up to the mark should
we only throw it on the shoulders of the leadership
Should we absolve the populace? Secondly, in Islam,
politics and religion are intertwining as dignity
and ethics are main characteristic of Islam, Should
we not shun western democracy and adopt Islamic
democracy as western democracy is liberal, and is
based on observation and experiment which clearly
negates divine knowledge? --
Ashrafuddin, Barenis, Chitral, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (5)
Very true face of
democracy in Pakistan is shown in this article. Col
(r) Ikram Ullah Khan is keen observer of the system,
and has showed the real face of politics in
Pakistan. -- Fardad Ali Shah
(student), Garam Chashma, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (6)
I was a boy may be
student of class 7th when on the way to my school I
saw a piece of news paper and put it up. the
writings of this piece include an interview of a
politician belonging to Sri lanka. The reporter
asked a question that when did you chose politics as
your profession? She replied that politics is not a
profession at all, it is infact a duty of all
citizens. At that time i could not get the actual
sense of the saying. But now i'm thinking that why
politics in Pakistan is on the decline day by day.
Only because our leaders perform it as a profession
not as a national duty.
--
Zakaria, Garam Chashma, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (7)
Democracy has played
it's innings. It has been so corrupted over the
years that it is irrecoverable now and should retire
hurt at best. Some friends suggest more democracy to
correct its failings. I for one don't agree. When
the foundations have rotted, how can you continue
building on it. Is it not a fact that dirty money
and dirty mafias are the prime drivers of today's
politicians and this phenomenon is increasing in
magnitude with each successive elections. Capable
people are nowhere to be seen in today's democracy.
Dictatorship is certainly not the alternative, for
it is a bigger evil, but then, we must not be
condemned to choose between evils. Why get stuck
with these two opposing systems only. Why not look
beyond these self created horizons.. To me
'Meritocracy' mentioned in the Editorials of this
site, seems to be the answer and I'm sure one day it
will replace Democracy as the favorite system of the
world. -- Wg Cdr (r) Fardad Ali Shah, Chitral, 25
February, 2011.
Comment (8)
I appreciate CN and
writer's efforts to create political awareness among
masses. Thank you very much.
-- Rehan Ali, Karachi, 25 February, 2011.
Comment (9)
Democracy,
Meritocracy, Dictatorship or any form of government
will be a failure as our roots are spoiled with the
evil of corruption and unethical practices, not only
our leaders but we all as an individual or as nation
are infected. If we welcome Meritocracy with the
same corrupted approach, how can we expect it to be
a revolution? It will be a complete failure like
Democracy. We all are familiar with what is
happening in our country in the name of Democracy,
as we are facing the consequences but why not we
avoid the aggressive approach in the name of
"Revolution" like Egypt, Tunisia, Libya etc. A mere
change of Leadership cannot be named as Revolution,
we are just changing faces, and instead we have to
face the change. I have these questions; Why we are
always complaining? Why we don't even think about
"Possible Solutions"? Why we are sleeping when
Elections are conducted? How many of us cast our
Vote? Why not we as a nation take responsibility and
support the honest Leadership and cast vote for
them? We can bring a revolution when we as nation
take 100 % responsibility and admit that our
miseries are the fruits of our attitude as nation.
--Sajjad Baig, Saudi Arabia,
26 February, 2011.
I would like to second and
reinforce the views of learned intellectual and
writer Col (R ) Ikramullakh Khan on the
political culture of Pakistani society. In my
career as a teacher I deal with students aged
between 16-20. The younger generation defines
our political culture as a “ dirty game”. Each
year I conduct an opinion poll on future career.
Nobody among 1000 students wants to join
politics by choice. This is how our politicians
have polluted our socio political fabric and
moral values of politics through their practice
of corruption, opportunism, mismanagement and
misconduct. We are in need of leaders like lee
kuan you , Nelson Mondela and Mahatir Muhammad
for securing the future of our coming
generations. Nobody of such caliber is in sight
in the “ available stock” of our so called
political leaders. I do salute Coll( R )
Ikramullah Khan for his thought provoking
article on Pharisaism. Bravo! Keep it up.
--
Dr. Inayatullah Faizi , Chitral , 02 Mar, 2011.
Comment (11)
Col Ikram has raised many excellent
points in his write up reflecting the troubling
scenario of political leadership in Pakistan.
Particularly his concerns about the erosion of
ethical values in public servants in conducting
public affairs and ensuing loss of trust in their
integrity are instructive. In my view, this is the
real issue. He has encapsulated this leadership
ethical malaise in a lovely sentence: ‘But the
apathy of our leadership has hardened them to an
extent that they fail to fathom the pain felt by the
poor.’ Equally thought provoking are what he calls
preconditions of democracy, particularly the first
condition that is education. I would go a step
further to say, not any education but good education
because we know there is bad education and good
education out there. Good education is one which
builds in a person a character that embodies values
of honesty, integrity, justice, fairness, and
respect for human dignity regardless of
socio-economic status, ethnicity, creed or political
affiliation. Currently, to my knowledge, there is no
good citizenship education that can inculcate these
values in students who are the leaders of tomorrow
to govern the country. I believe if Pakistan gets
its education system right, other malaises, be they
societal, economic, governance or legal, will
dissolve like a pile of snow avalanche; looks huge
but melts away within weeks or months.
Col. Ikram’s article has drawn some profound
comments as well. To allude to all of them will
exceed the space limit of my comments. However, I
would like to briefly highlight one comment by Wg
Cdr (r) Fardad Ali Shah. His notion of meritocracy
as an alternative to democracy is interesting and
deserves serious consideration. It appears to me
that the notion of democracy that Col. Ikram seems
to favor is in some way resonates with the notion of
meritocracy. The difference, as I see it, is that
democracy is a framework of governance whereas
meritocracy is the quality capacity that brings
quality to the governance. To address the issue of
political leadership, neither of the two on its own
is good enough. Democracy without meritocracy, that
is the quality of the citizen and those who they
elect them as law makers, is meaningless. Likewise,
meritocracy without democracy will lead to power
accumulation engendering autocracy in its worst
form.
While I enjoyed reading Col. Ikram’s article, I
nonetheless felt that the tone of the article was a
bit over pessimistic. With his career background, I
am sure, he knows well how important it is to
instill hope in those on the frontline than to shake
their confidence when the battle appears to be
insurmountable. We must have every hope in the
talents and ingenuity of the new generation of
Pakistanis to win the battle through the power of
intellect rather than through the display of rage.
--- Dr. Mir Baiz Khan,
Toronto, Canada, 04 Mar 2011.
(If you
wish to comment on the above write up, you can send your
comments at
chitralnews@yahoo.com.
Please go through the
House Rules before sending comments)
|