Refresh to view the
latest page
Efficient usage of Lowari Tunnel
-letter4
Lowari Tunnel
Letter-'Dawn'
With reference to the letter, 'Lowari Tunnel'
(Dawn,March 27), the writer has very well explained
the reasons for the tunnel being a rail tunnel
instead of a road tunnel.
However, there are certain aspects which should be
considered, which are in favour of a road tunnel.
First is the density of traffic in the tunnel as the
degree of emissions in the tunnel will depend upon
the level of density. If the traffic flow is very
low, then the emission could be easily controlled
without having expensive ventilation shafts.
I have seen ventilation exhaust fans fitted at the
ceilings of road tunnels for ventilation purposes.
Also, there is natural draft produced in the tunnel
due to difference of pressure at the portals of the
tunnel. This arrangement will take care of emissions
in the tunnel to a great extent.
The emission could also be controlled by controlling
the flow of traffic. At the entrance of the tunnel,
vehicles could be controlled so that there is, for
instance, a distance of 20 feet maintained between
them and the speed of the vehicles restricted to say
30-40 mph. In this way the emission density could be
lessened, which could be handled by the exhaust fans
on the ceiling.
The flow of traffic to and from Chitral is very low
and is not of highly economic nature. If the flow
rate of road traffic is on the lower side, it will
not have any significant economic impact in the
region.
Use of railways in the tunnel will be a weak link in
the transportation system, as the railway’s
equipment will be additional capital cost item and a
running cost of operation, repairs and maintenance.
Electric power will have to be brought up to the
tunnel, which will be a major problem, due to
national power shortage and power outages.
The operation and stoppage of tunnel will solely
(and sorely!) depend upon the power being on and
off. There will have to be full fledged repairs and
maintenance facility, a residential colony for the
labour and staff, availability of utilities, etc. A
small fault in the railway system will result in
closure of the tunnel, until the fault is removed.
All this will not be needed in case of a road
tunnel.
If the road tunnel proves inefficient it could
easily be converted to a rail tunnel; but a railway
tunnel cannot be that easily made into a road
tunnel.
Let us have a road tunnel in the least possible
time, knowing that this project is dragging on since
several decades, not years, displaying the
credibility of our planning and implementation of
projects of national importance.
A. Rahim,
Karachi.
30 March 09.
Efficient usage of Lowari Tunnel
-letter3
This refers to the subject news item which contains
proposals presented by Wg Cdr (r) Fardad Ali Shah to
the Federal Minister for communication Dr. Arbab
Alamgir Khan about the Lawari road tunnel. We
appreciate the recommendations put forward by Mr
Shah keeping in view the best interests of the
people of Chitral and to make the best of the Lawari
Tunnel.
We here fully agree with him that how
can a sophisticated railway system be expected to be
operated efficiently in this remote place of our
country. Keeping in view the past poor performance
of our Railway system many experts in the relevant
field have already expressed their reservations
about the successful operation of the proposed
railway system through Lawari Tunnel. Now the Wg Cdr
has taken a positive initiative in trying to
persuade the concerned high authorities to
commission the Tunnel as a Road Tunnel in right time
before wasting money on the rail system. It is
heartening to know that the Federal Minister for
communication and the Chairman NHA have been
receptive to the idea.
We the people of Chitral recommend that after
catering for technicalities, the proposal should be
considered on merit in the best interest of the
users.
Bashir Hussain Azad,
Chitral.
07 March, 09.
Efficient usage of Lowari Tunnel
-letter2
This is with reference to the report
in chitralnews.com that Wing Cdr (r) Fardad Ali Shah
had meetings with Federal Minister for Communication
Dr Arbab Alamgir and Chairman NHA to stress upon
them that converting the under construction Lawari
tunnel into road traffic instead of railway would be
more appropriate. The latter have reportedly assured
Mr Shah that his recommendation regarding making the
Lawari tunnel road traffic worthy would be given a
serious consideration. I personally appreciate the
efforts of Mr. Shah being a deeply patriotic
Chitrali, but submit two important points with
respect to the current issues relating to Lawari
tunnel project.
Firstly, ever since completion of the first phase of
Lawari tunnel project the local politics is at the
peak, trying to make this life line for Chitral a
controversial matter. These controversies revolve
around taking credit by the local politicians for
construction of Lawari tunnel on the one hand and
its immediate opening for traffic on the other. I
sincerely feel that in both cases political motives
instead of public interest are being kept supreme.
The people of Chitral contrary to being deaf and
dump, as political leaders consider them, understand
fully well that who took the decision to construct
this strategic project for reasons best known to the
decision maker. I agree with Shahzada Masoodul Mulk,
who observed in a seminar the other day that
�construction of Lawari tunnel was a political
decision, driven as much by the mystique of Chitral
as was by strategic and political consideration. In
simple terms it was just our good luck. The
situation is very different today�. It is also a
hard reality that people of Chitral have been
suffering for centuries due to closure of Lawari
pass in winters, but not for the first time in
history. Making genuine efforts to ease the problems
of people is a positive thinking but taking the
Lawari tunnel issue to the extreme height of tension
is nothing else than part of dirty local politics.
Secondly, in a layman�s language as we were informed
then, that the construction of Lawari rail tunnel
was to cost one third of the estimated cost of road
tunnel. If road tunnel was to cost twenty four
billion rupees then rail tunnel was only eight
billions. That was one of the cogent reasons for
opting the later option. Due to inflation and other
factors rail tunnel is reportedly going to cost
nineteen billion rupees and for road tunnel
logically multiply it by three. Had it been
financially feasible, the then government would have
decided in favour of road tunnel. Making a project
technically controversial at this belated stage, not
by anyone else but the people of Chitral, is nothing
but a collective suicide. If nothing else such
proposals can at least cause inordinate delay in
completion of the project, in view of fresh
feasibility studies, approval processes, calling
tenders etc.
Irrespective of these figures and the local
political controversies I appeal to all the
patriotic Chitralis to kindly understand one simple
fact that the situation is really very different
today, both politically, financially and security
wise. Our small misadventures on Lawari tunnel
projects may result in disastrous outcomes for
Chitral. For God sake let the government departments
and the foreign company carry out their work on the
project as per their envisaged plan. Strengthen
their efforts and dedication with your praise. Being
the worst affectees, Chitral people should not take
any chance that may result either in winding up the
project on security, financial and other reasons or
its construction with unsound technical provisions.
May Allah Bless us with enough wisdom.
Tariq Mehmood
Islamabad
05 March, 09.
Efficient usage of Lowari Tunnel
-letter
This is with reference to a good news
published in Chitral News (03 March),
according to which The Govt. is likely to consider
commissioning the Lowari Tunnel as a road tunnel
instead of the earlier proposed rail tunnel. As a
matter of fact, it would be a wet blanket for
Chitralis, if the design is not changed to a road
tunnel.
Muhammad Abeer Khan,
Jughoor, Chitral.
04 March, 09.